Everyone makes mistakes; that is a fact. But what happens when a staff member makes a mistake that has disastrous consequences for the Company, or the client of a Company? And how does a small business handle the fall out? In this month’s HR update, prompted by feedback from the last update, we take a look at this thorny subject.

You may remember last year Ealing Council’s IT network was infected by a computer virus that brought all its services to a halt after an employee plugged an infected USB memory stick into their computer which then infected every single Council computer and tried to connect with over 500 Internet sites. Ooops. What are the employment law implications of this situation? How does an employer deal with these kinds of mistakes, particularly those which can result in financial loss or reputational damage?

For the answer, an employer needs to investigate the error and what exactly happened. Was it a case of negligence, deliberate disregard for procedure or perhaps a genuine error on the employee’s part? And what happens if the mistake affects a particularly valuable client?

Supposing, in the case above, the employee had deliberately disregarded the IT policy by bringing in external IT equipment; this would be subject to disciplinary action, and subject to the explanation, action could be taken against the employee. If it was a genuine mistake, perhaps she picked up the wrong USB stick, then probably the fact that her actions caused such disruption would prevent similar occurrences. Check your policy and if issues occur, consider amending and reissuing it to staff.

What if a client is particularly disrupted and financially affected by a mistake an employee has made? And what if they demand action to be taken against the employee? This could mean a warning, removal from working on their account or even dismissal. Such dismissals may potentially be fair – under the “some other substantial reason” – however, caution should be taken here. You’ll need to consider, amongst other factors, the severity of the mistake, the resources and size of the Company and the significance of the client.

The lesson here is that you need to be fair, firm and consistent in dealing with employee mistakes, and make sure policies and procedures are amended in the wake of any errors; i.e. learn from your mistakes!

If you have a topic that you’d like us to cover in a future update, please let us know by emailing us at Adviceline@vizualhr.com.

The information contained above is for guidance only and represents our understanding of employment law and employee relations issues as at 27th May 2010. VizualHR cannot be held responsible for any action or inaction taken in reliance upon the contents. Specific advice should be sought on any individual matter.

HR.net Enterprise Case Study – Republic Publishing, Apple Mac-based company, creates content for websites and publishers. “HR.net Enterprise helps us with information that would have taken days to create before… All these are now available at the click of a mouse.”

Click the thumbnail below to read the full Case Study:

Republic Publishing

Softworld Select is a new event format focused on demonstrating the latest HR and payroll software and services. It offers delegates a unique opportunity to attend several pre-arranged meetings in one day and view product demonstrations.

Softworld Select, HR and Payroll Solutions takes place on Wednesday 19 May 2010 in the state-of-the-art grandstand at Ascot Racecourse. Because there are only limited places available, attendance is by invitation only. This will allow the Softworld event team to individually tailor each delegate’s timetable and provide a truly personal service.

You will be able to see demos of HR.net Enterprise and ADP® freedom®.

HR.net Enterprise is developed using the latest .NET technology, and has been designed for larger organisations or those with complex HR requirements. It is packed with features to help you improve efficiency and increase productivity in your business. It comes with comprehensive HR functionality allowing you to manage the entire lifecycle in one application. The powerful workflow technology allows you to automate virtually any business process and, because HR.net Enterprise is web-based and multi-country enabled, it can be deployed quickly across multiple locations. HR.net Enterprise’s flexibility combined with an innovative graphical workflow tool has helped establish it as a leading technology in the HR solutions market.

ADP® freedom® is a payroll solution, designed for organisations who are looking to achieve efficiency through best practice and gain effortless access to real time information.

Delivered as a unique web based solution, ADP freedom offers variable levels of payroll service. As a processing service, ADP freedom delivers all the advantages and characteristics of modern in-house software and is supported by value added expert payroll services. As a fully managed payroll service, ADP experts manage the entire payroll process of behalf of clients.

Register for an invitation at Softworld Select here.

Fit Note vs. Sick Note

March 22nd, 2010

The Department of Work and Pensions have announced that from next month, GP sick notes will be replaced by “fit notes” (aka Statement of Fitness for Work) in an effort to support people in getting back to work. Whilst most would agree that something had to be done to improve the current sick note system, the new fit note system has not been universally welcomed by employers and GPs.

What can we expect to see on “fit notes”?

The new fit notes will mean that doctors can advise that an employee is unfit for work or may be fit for work and will give more information on how your employee’s condition may affect the role they perform. The statement is still not required until after the 7th calendar day of sickness.

Fit notes will focus on what employees can do, with GPs listing changes that employers can make to help an employee back to work. The changes included are:
- A phased return to work
- Altered hours
- Amended duties
- Workplace adaptations

Where the GP has ticked “may be fit for work”, there is a large space for the doctor’s comments on the effects of your employee’s condition and what adaptations could help them return to work.
The DWP advise that the notes are not about trying to get people back into work before they are ready, but about moving the challenges to the returning. The scheme places an onus on employers and employees working together to get staff back to work despite their illness or injury. The advice is not binding, it is the employer’s prerogative on how to act on the doctor’s advice. If the adaptations suggested by the doctor are not possible, employers should explain the reason to the employee then treat the note a “not fit for work” note.

What’s the prognosis?

The scheme has not been universally welcomed. There is concern within the medical profession that GPs are not occupational health specialists and as such, should not be given the responsibility of making thorough recommendations regarding someone’s condition and possible adaptations to their role, which they may have no knowledge of, particularly within a 5-10 minute appointment.

From an employer’s perspective, there is the unknown of what the implications are, particularly under the Disability Discrimination Act, of not implementing the GP’s advice. Although the DWP state that the statement is not binding, the system has yet to be tested at Tribunal level. On a separate note, as many HR professionals are too aware, deciphering doctor’s writing in terms of the condition can be tricky enough, it remains to be seen, pardon the pun, if this paragraph will cause more deciphering difficulties.

If you have a topic that you’d like us to cover in a future update, please let us know by emailing us at Adviceline@vizualhr.com.

The information contained above is for guidance only and represents our understanding of employment law and employee relations issues as at 22nd March 2010. VizualHR cannot be held responsible for any action or inaction taken in reliance upon the contents. Specific advice should be sought on any individual matter.